Introduction: disorder in real life
The concepts of disorder and entropy are central themes when attempting to understand the thermodynamic processes that happen at a large scale. Disorder is easy to relate to macroscopically, as it is just a description of the level of organization and randomness in an area. A room with clothes everywhere on the floor has more disorder than a room where the clothes have been folded and put into place. Entropy, however, is a more nuanced term. Entropy provides a description for why heat seems to flow from hot to cold areas, and why mixtures of hot and cold objects produce a temperature somewhere in the middle. Entropy is fundamental to the thermodynamic properties of a system.
Microstates and Macrostates
Ultimately, the point of thermodynamics is to explain the everyday world with the molecular world. Given a physical system, we can find out properties of that system, like temperature, and try explaining that property in terms of the properties of the system’s molecules. The state of the system is the macrostate, and the state of the component molecules of that system is the microstate. For example, we can explain a macrostates like temperature and pressure in terms of microstates like the kinetic energy of the system’s molecules.
Let’s look at temperature in order to get a better idea of what microstates are. We have a given amount of energy for the system that is distributed among the molecules of that system. Each molecule can have a specific kinetic energy, and the microstate describes the kinetic energy of each molecule in the system. The total energy of that system can be spread differently among the molecules, giving different kinetic energies for the molecules. Thus, many microstates are possible for a system.
Question: What is the microstate when we are dealing with temperature?
-
The distribution of temperatures possible for a system.
-
The distribution of kinetic energies allowed for a specific molecule in the system.
-
The distribution (i.e. “histogram”) of kinetic energies for the molecules in the system. This would not include information on which molecule has which kinetic energy.
-
The description of which molecule has which kinetic energy.
Answer: D
Citation: Matter and Interactions, Chabay, Sherwood
Statistical Mechanics
Citation: Matter and Interactions, Chabay, Sherwood
How do we go from the kinetic energies of molecules to explaining why heat moves from hot to low temperature? Statistical mechanics bridges the gap between the molecular and the visible. The fundamental assumption of statistical mechanics is that, in the long term, a system has an equal chance of being in any microstate. You can understand it as follows: get a deck of cards. Shuffle it. If you shuffle it well, you will probably have an equal chance of getting any order of cards in the deck. The point is that with ~1023 molecules, shuffling the speeds of the molecules through random molecular collisions will give a random, unpredictable distribution of molecular kinetic energies.
This fundamental assumption only applies at the thermodynamic limit, that is, when there are a huge number of molecules in the system and they can interact in an infinite number of ways.
Though a system has an equal chance in being in any one microstate, not all microstates are the same. Think about the following example: If you had two pennies and two quarters, and randomly chose two, which two coins are you most likely to get? You will have a 50% chance of getting one penny and one quarter, and getting all pennies or all quarters has only a 25% chance each. So even though the two-penny-two-quarter option is made up of either having the first coin be a quarter or penny, we only care about how much money we got in the end.
Notice that we can discuss which coin is a penny or quarter. The “microstate” tells us whether coin is a penny or quarter, for all the coins you picked. The distribution of quarters and pennies you picked doesn’t distinguish between the microstate of a quarter and a penny, and the microstate of a penny and a quarter. So the distribution is just a count of how many quarters and pennies you have. Finally, the “macrostate” is the total amount of money you won.
The analogy applies directly to temperature. We don’t care which molecule has which kinetic energy, but we do care about how many molecules have a specific kinetic energy (i.e. the distribution of molecular kinetic energies). The distribution can be represented by any microstate which only differs by which molecule has that kinetic energy given in the distribution. Thus, if there are a huge number of combinations allowed by a specific distribution of molecular kinetic energies, then you have a huge number of microstates, since each microstate is both the distribution of molecular kinetic energies and which molecule has which kinetic energy. As a result, by the fundamental assumption, you are more likely to see the system with the distribution of kinetic energy that is represented by all those microstates.
So we can now explain how heat moves from hot to cold objects. Each molecule can only take on discrete kinetic energies (due to quantum mechanics). So if we put a hot object next to a cold object, we will predict the final state of both the hot object and cold object to be the state that is represented by the greatest number of microstates. By the fundamental assumption, you are taking the kinetic energies of the molecules in the hot and cold objects, and redistributing those kinetic energies randomly.
Say that only two kinetic energies are allowed: high and low. The hot object has molecules which have all high kinetic energy and the cold object has molecules with low kinetic energy. In addition, both the hot and cold object have three molecules each. We can calculate the probability for each possible microstate (i.e. distribution of low and high kinetic energy molecules). If you do the calculation (see problem below), the microstate with the low and high kinetic energies distributed roughly evenly between the objects is the most likely distribution. Thus, the objects will have roughly the same kinetic energy, or equivalently, temperature.
This situation can be scaled up to 1023 molecules, and the end result is that there are so many microstates that split higher and lower kinetic energies is that you will with virtually complete certainty see the temperature decreasing in the hot object and increasing for the cold object as the kinetic energies of the molecules are randomly distributed between the hot and cold object’s molecules.
Citation: Matter and Interactions, Chabay, Sherwood
Question:There are two systems with two molecules each. A molecule either has high or low kinetic energy. Calculate the probabilities for each distribution of kinetic energy, and how many microstates are represented by that distribution.
Hint with Partial Answer:
For a review on permutations and combinations (which you will need in this problem), see this link: http://www.mathsisfun.com/combinatorics/combinations-permutations.html .
Essentially, you can use Pascal’s Triangle to see that distributing the kinetic energies between the molecules evenly gives the greatest number of microstates.
S=kln(Ω) : Basic equation for entropy
With base e assumed, this equation is called the Planck entropy or Boltzmann entropy formula. The formula is an application of statistical mechanics, where S is the entropy of an ideal gas system, k is the Boltzmann constant, and Ω (omega), meaning probability, is the number of “microstates” the particles in the system can be found.
Entropy depends on the logarithm of Ω is no more than having a convenient way to evaluate it, because logarithm of the product of two numbers equals the sum of the logarithms of the individual numbers (i.e. ln(Ω1)+ln(Ω2)=ln(Ω1Ω2)). The reason we should multiply Ω is simply the product rule in probability: for each state of system 1, system 2 can be in any of Ω2 states. Therefore, if two systems are combined, Ω in the combined system would be the product of the original Ω in each system.
Citation: http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Wikitexts/Simon_Fraser_Chem1%3A_Lower/Thermodynamics_of_Chemical_Equilibrium/Entropy#Entropy_and_.22disorder.22 )
Question: If you combine three systems together, with each system having n possible microstates, then the combined system will have 3n microstates.
-
True. The number of microstates is an additive property of systems.
-
True. Entropy is an additive property of thermodynamic systems.
-
False. The number of microstates possible is the product of the individual microstates.
-
False. Entropy is a multiplicative property and so there are n3 possible microstates.
Answer: C
Second law of Thermodynamics
The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of the universe never decreases. This fundamental law explains why heat always flows from one end to the other when there exists a difference. This is to say, if you put a cup of hot tea in room temperature, the temperature of the tea will always drop. Heat never flow backwards--if it did, the number of microstates of the combined system would have decreased and the combined hot-cold systems would decrease in entropy, thus disobeys the second law of thermodynamics.
Based on our previous discussion of statistical mechanics, this law directly follows from the probability of observing a system that in a macrostate represented by a certain number of indistinguishable microstates (i.e. the distribution of kinetic energy of the molecules are the same between two possible microstates, but the way kinetic energy are distributed to individual molecules is different). For example, if a system has 4 molecules, as indicated on the left, it will has 16 microstates. There are will be 4/16 of the time when one molecule is in the top part; 6/16 of the time when two molecules are in the top part, but only 1/16 of the time that all four molecules are in the top part. As a result, the system probabilistically favours to be in microstates with higher disorder. Thus, it is virtually impossible to observe a decrease in entropy for systems with large numbers of molecules.
Citation: http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Thermodynamics/Laws_of_Thermodynamics/Second_Law_of_Thermodynamics
Question:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics is actually an approximation; there is an extremely small chance that the universe’s entropy can decrease.
-
False. The law is assumed to be true, since it always holds.
-
True. The law is statistical in reality, but it holds due to the large size of the universe.
-
False. The law accurately explains large-scale phenomena, and so it accurately describes the universe.
-
True. The second law of thermodynamics can visibly fail once in a lifetime.
Answer: B.
Third law of Thermo: entropy of system at T=0 K is zero
“the entropy of any pure substance (element or compound) in its equilibrium state
approaches zero at the absolute zero of temperature” – (Oxtoby p. 590)?”--Why?
The third law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of a perfect crystal of a pure substance approaches zero as the absolute temperature approaches zero. Since temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of all component particles, and since absolute zero is the floor for temperature at which the kinetic energy of each individual particle is zero, the third law of thermodynamics is able to say that if there is no net temperature, there is no net entropy because every molecule will be stationary and so there can be no random redistribution of kinetic energy between molecules. Thus, as the energy of this crystal approaches zero, the unique vibrations of each atom or molecule are reduced to zero.
It should be noted that a perfect crystal is needed because then there is no ambiguity about the position of the system components or orientations, which would interfere with the system reaching an equilibrium.
Question:
True or false: Temperature is a measure of average kinetic energy, and so at absolute zero for a perfect crystal of a pure substance entropy > 0.
-
True - average kinetic energy means some particles could be above and below absolute zero, meaning there are some unique vibrations and so there is entropy
-
True - entropy is the randomness of a system and so even if temperature is zero there is randomness in position
-
False - because there is no negative kinetic energy at absolute zero there would be no kinetic energy for any particle - thus entropy is zero.
-
False - one crystal cannot have entropy because entropy is a measure of the randomness between two bodies
Answer - C
Application: Temperature
Microstates: kinetic energy
How temperature is derived from kinetic energy of molecules
1 question
Difficult Concept: Entropy vs. Disorder
Remember that entropy tells us how many microstates are possible for a system, but this characterization of entropy only applies to thermodynamic systems like gas molecules. Disorder, on the other hand, is a more general term for how random a system is. Disorder does often increase with entropy. For example, when coffee cools, the distribution of the molecular speeds for molecules in the coffee and in the environment becomes more random. However, we can also talk about disorder in the context of a clean vs. messy room, but entropy and the mathematics behind it are applicable only to molecular systems.
Citation:
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Wikitexts/Simon_Fraser_Chem1%3A_Lower/Thermodynamics_of_Chemical_Equilibrium/Entropy#Entropy_and_.22disorder.22
Question about Difficult Concept:
Entropy is applicable to mixing a deck of cards.
-
True. Entropy is a measure of disorder in the system.
-
True. Calculating the different combinations of cards possible gives us the entropy.
-
False. Entropy is applicable to thermodynamic systems and systems with thermal energy.
-
False. Mixing a deck of cards is a thermodynamic system, but disorder is not an applicable concept.
Answer: C
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.